Rome :: essays research papers

capital of Italy began as a small city-state. Its army and way of running government re master(prenominal)ed the same as the small city grew to a huge empire. Somehow, this small-time system of management lasted for 600 years. Its obvious ill suitedness showed through though, when Romes once strong rigid links began to jingle. When Rome began to crumble, its army went first. Besides do civil unrest, with the people knowing their army was less than satisfactory, the loss of the armys comforting presence also caused a feeling of exhaustedness about Rome. The economy of Rome was not perfect either. Though the taxes were heavy, they were not able to cover the cost of government and construction of public buildings, the maintenance of the army, support two capitals, and so forth etc. Because of this, Romes splendor and beauty began to diminish (without the public funding to preserve the beauty), unrepaired roads and bridges, increased bandi cause, danger in travel (hence decreased trad e), and a weak army. This was all because Rome did not organize an economic style made for and fitting an empire of its size.A final force in the decay of Rome, perchance as a result of the previous mentioned, was loss of public morale and values. Although in general, Rome was always mainly without the morals righteous people try to uphold today, Romans were hardworking, athletic, philosophical, stern, noble, and patriotic. When public morale decreased, however, Rome fell into a pit of laziness, unethical, disloyal dishonesty. One example of how this effected society, is when armies were pressured to work hard, the disloyal soldiers abandoned their legions to flee. Romes main problem, as you can see, is the combination of all of these factors.